jacket comparison
Arc'teryx Beta vs Patagonia Torrentshell 3L
Both are three-layer shells, and there the similarity ends. One is a mountain-oriented hardshell at a premium price; the other is a repairable rain shell at roughly a third of it. The interesting question is not which is better but which set of compromises fits your use.
Side by side
Manufacturer figures where published, otherwise stated as unpublished
| Attribute | Arc'teryx Beta | Patagonia Torrentshell 3L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $199 |
| Construction | 3L | 3L |
| Membrane | GORE-TEX ePE | H2No Performance Standard |
| Published waterproof rating | Not publicly specified by manufacturer | Not publicly specified by manufacturer |
| Published breathability rating | Not publicly specified by manufacturer | Not publicly specified by manufacturer |
| Face fabric denier | Not publicly specified by manufacturer | 50D |
| Pit zips | No | Yes |
| Hood | Helmet compatible | Roll-down, not helmet compatible |
| Packability | No stuff pocket | Stuffs into its own pocket |
| Warranty | Limited lifetime | Ironclad Guarantee |
| Repair | Yes, in supported regions | Worn Wear repair service |
| Research score | 7.9 | 7.6 |
| Best use | Mountain days, helmet use | Hiking, travel, commuting |
Which should you choose?
Recommendations by reader, not one overall verdict
If you climb or ski
The Beta. The helmet-compatible hood and pattern work are the reason for the price.
If you hike and commute
The Torrentshell. Pit zips and a stuff pocket matter more day to day than alpine pattern work.
If you want the lowest cost per year of use
Either can win, depending on how often you wear it. Both brands repair their garments.
If venting is your priority
The Torrentshell, simply because the Beta in this specification has no pit zips.