materials

PFAS in Waterproof Jackets Explained

PFAS did two jobs in waterproof clothing — membranes and water-repellent finishes — and the industry is removing them from both, at different speeds.

Last updated Published By WaterproofJacket.com editorial desk

Quick answer

PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are a large family of fluorinated chemicals — the OECD definition covers thousands of substances — that were used in waterproof clothing for two distinct jobs: as the membrane itself (expanded PTFE, the original GORE-TEX membrane, is a fluoropolymer) and as the durable water-repellent finish on the outer fabric. The industry is phasing them out at different speeds: DWR finishes have moved fastest, with many brands now using non-fluorinated finishes, while membrane transitions (such as Gore's ePE) are newer. Label claims need careful reading: 'PFC-free' and 'without intentionally added PFAS' are scoped claims — they describe what was deliberately added to specific components, not a certification that the finished product contains no PFAS at all. Regulation is tightening in both the EU and individual US states.

Key takeaways

  • PFAS served two separate functions: the membrane (ePTFE) and the DWR finish. Ask which one a claim refers to.
  • 'Without intentionally added PFAS' is a scoped claim about deliberate addition to specific components — not a zero-PFAS certification of the whole product.
  • The OECD definition of PFAS covers thousands of substances; 'PFC-free' is older, looser vocabulary for the same concern.
  • DWR finishes have transitioned fastest; membrane transitions (e.g. GORE-TEX ePE) are more recent.
  • Regulation is moving: the EU has restricted PFHxA in consumer textiles, and several US states restrict PFAS in apparel.
Fact — published information

Two jobs, two timelines

Fluorinated chemistry did two different jobs in a waterproof jacket. The membrane: expanded PTFE, the original GORE-TEX membrane, is itself a fluoropolymer — a PFAS under the OECD definition. The finish: durable water-repellent treatments were long based on fluorocarbon chemistry ('C8', then 'C6') because fluorinated finishes repel oil as well as water, and last longer than the alternatives.

The phase-out has run at different speeds for the two jobs. Non-fluorinated DWR finishes are now widespread — Patagonia documents its own transition away from PFAS-based finishes across its range, and Rab publishes a per-product PFAS column. Membrane replacement is newer and harder: Gore's ePE membrane, which replaces expanded PTFE with expanded polyethylene, reached garments only in recent seasons.

Fact — published information

Reading the labels precisely

The claims you will meet are scoped, and the scope is the whole story. 'Without intentionally added PFAS' — the wording Rab uses, defined on its site as having phased out all intentionally added PFAS per component — means the brand did not deliberately add PFAS to that component. It is not a test result and not a claim that the finished product contains no detectable PFAS: contamination in supply chains and the ambiguity of the broad OECD definition sit outside the claim.

'PFC-free' is the older term for the same concern. And a claim about the DWR says nothing about the membrane, or vice versa: a jacket can carry a fluorine-free finish on a PTFE membrane, or a fluorine-free membrane under a fluorinated finish. This database preserves the exact scope of each manufacturer's wording for exactly this reason.

Fact — published information

The regulatory direction

Regulation is tightening on both sides of the Atlantic. In the EU, PFHxA and related substances have been restricted in consumer textiles under REACH. In the US, the EPA has acted on PFOA and PFOS, and individual states — California, New York and Colorado among them — have enacted their own restrictions on PFAS in apparel, which is why some product pages now carry state-specific shipping notices.

The practical consequence for buyers is transitional messiness: the same product can carry different PFAS statements in different regions and seasons as formulations change. Outdoor Research's Foray 3L, in this database, carries a 'contains PFAS' shipping notice on its product page while the brand's campaign page describes the line as free from intentionally added PFAS — a conflict we preserve rather than resolve.

Common misconceptions

“'PFC-free' means the product contains no PFAS.”

It means no PFAS were intentionally added to the components the claim covers. It is a sourcing declaration, not an analytical test of the finished garment.

“PFAS were only in the DWR.”

The original GORE-TEX membrane, expanded PTFE, is itself a fluoropolymer. Membranes and finishes are separate questions, and a claim about one says nothing about the other.

Frequently asked questions

Are PFAS in jackets a health risk to the wearer?

The documented concern driving regulation is primarily environmental — PFAS persist, accumulate and spread through manufacturing emissions and product disposal. We do not make exposure claims about wearing these garments; that question is outside what our sources establish.

How do I find a PFAS-free jacket?

Look for brands that publish per-component statements — Rab's per-product PFAS column is the clearest example in this database — and read the exact scope. A claim covering 'intentionally added PFAS' on the DWR does not cover the membrane unless it says so.

Sources

  1. OECDOECD — Reconciling terminology of the universe of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (Series on Risk Management No. 61, 2021)— checked September 15, 2026
  2. US Environmental Protection AgencyUS Environmental Protection Agency — Technical fact sheet — PFOS and PFOA— checked September 15, 2026
  3. PatagoniaPatagonia — PFCs, PFAS and our materials— checked September 15, 2026
  4. W. L. Gore & AssociatesW. L. Gore & Associates — GORE-TEX support — DWR (durable water repellent) care— checked September 15, 2026
  5. Mountain EquipmentMountain Equipment — Looking after your PFAS-free waterproof shell— checked September 15, 2026
  6. The North FaceThe North Face — FUTURELIGHT technology— checked September 15, 2026
  7. UL Solutions (summarising Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2462)UL Solutions (summarising Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2462) — PFHxA and related substances: Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2462— checked September 15, 2026
  8. W. L. Gore & AssociatesW. L. Gore & Associates — Introducing our new expanded polyethylene (ePE) membrane— checked September 15, 2026

Related reading