Technology · Jack Wolfskin

TEXAPORE

Jack Wolfskin's in-house waterproof family, covering everyday rainwear through to more technical builds.

Specifications last verified 2026-10-11Independent documentation
Analysis — our interpretation

TEXAPORE vs GORE-TEX: the short answer

They are different kinds of thing. TEXAPORE is Jack Wolfskin's own waterproof fabric family, used only in Jack Wolfskin products. GORE-TEX is a licensed platform from W. L. Gore & Associates, used by many brands, which certifies finished garments rather than publishing a fabric rating.

That difference shows up in what you can read on a product page: TEXAPORE jackets typically show a water-column and breathability number with a named test method; GORE-TEX jackets typically show neither. Neither approach tells you on its own which jacket will keep you drier.

Fact — published information

What each side publishes

Published information, TEXAPORE vs GORE-TEX

Who uses it

TEXAPORE (Jack Wolfskin)

Jack Wolfskin only

GORE-TEX (W. L. Gore)

Licensed to many brands

Waterproof figure

TEXAPORE (Jack Wolfskin)

Per product, e.g. 10,000 mm (Trailtime 2L) or 20,000 mm (Rainrush 2L), method JIS L 1092

GORE-TEX (W. L. Gore)

No hydrostatic-head figure on Gore's technology pages

Breathability figure

TEXAPORE (Jack Wolfskin)

Per product, e.g. 6,000 or 15,000 g/m²/24h, method JIS L 1099 B-1

GORE-TEX (W. L. Gore)

No MVTR figure on Gore's consumer pages

How waterproofness is backed

TEXAPORE (Jack Wolfskin)

Fabric test result shown on each product page

GORE-TEX (W. L. Gore)

Gore certifies finished garments against its own requirements, including seams

Constructions seen

TEXAPORE (Jack Wolfskin)

2L jackets in the examples we checked; more technical builds also exist

GORE-TEX (W. L. Gore)

2L, 2.5L and 3L depending on the GORE-TEX product line

Jack Wolfskin figures read from UK product pages on 11 October 2026. GORE-TEX disclosure as recorded in our technical-facts register.

Analysis — our interpretation

Why the numbers cannot be compared directly

A JIS L 1099 B-1 breathability result is not comparable with an MVTR from another method, and it cannot be converted into a RET value. A TEXAPORE jacket rated 15,000 g/m²/24h is therefore not shown to breathe better or worse than a GORE-TEX jacket that publishes no figure.

The same applies to waterproofness: a fabric water-column result does not account for seams, zips, hood design or how the face fabric wets out. Gore's position is that garment-level requirements matter more than a fabric number; Jack Wolfskin chooses to publish the fabric number. Both are legitimate, and both leave gaps.

Analysis — our interpretation

Which suits what

TEXAPORE jackets sit mostly in the everyday-to-hiking price range and are a sensible choice when you want a stated figure and a named test method at a moderate price. GORE-TEX garments span from everyday to expedition use across many brands; at the top end they come with a garment-level guarantee rather than a number.

What we have not verified: the membrane chemistry of each TEXAPORE tier, and any lab comparison between the two. We have not tested either.

Related guides: hydrostatic head · waterproof ratings · MVTR · 2L vs 2.5L vs 3L · GORE-TEX vs other membranes

Manufacturer specification

Published figures only — nothing estimated

Owner
Jack Wolfskin
Membrane type
In-house membranes across several tiers
Construction options
2L
Waterproof rating
Published per product, not per platform. Examples checked: 10,000 mm and 20,000 mm (JIS L 1092)
Breathability rating
Published per product. Examples checked: 6,000 and 15,000 g/m²/24h (JIS L 1099 B-1)
Air permeability
Not publicly specified by manufacturer
Typical price segment
Varies by garment.
Weight characteristics
Varies by face fabric and construction rather than by membrane alone.
Durability characteristics
Durability depends on the textile, laminate, seams, use and care; denier alone does not establish abrasion resistance.
DWR requirements
Face fabrics carry a durable water repellent finish. Repellency wears off with use and needs reproofing; the membrane itself is unaffected.
PFAS / PFC information
Check the current season's material declaration. Many brands have moved to PFAS-free repellent finishes, and platforms differ by year and by garment.

WaterproofJacket.com assessment

Our editorial analysis, not a manufacturer claim

Main advantages

  • Good value
  • Broad range of cuts
  • Recycled options
  • Product pages name the test method behind each figure

Main disadvantages

  • Tier differences are not obvious at a glance
  • Entry versions breathe modestly

Best uses

  • Hiking
  • Everyday rain
  • Travel

Poor uses

  • Technical alpine climbing

Care instructions

  • Follow the garment label and official care instructions. Use the specified cleaner; Gore permits a small amount of suitable liquid detergent for conventional GORE-TEX outerwear. Avoid products those instructions prohibit.
  • For DWR-finished garments, clean first and reproof only if needed, following garment and treatment instructions. Do not apply DWR to persistent-beading constructions such as SHAKEDRY.
  • Tumble dry warm or press with a cool iron under a cloth if the care label allows, to reactivate the finish.

Frequently asked questions

Is TEXAPORE as good as GORE-TEX?

There is no published like-for-like test that answers this. TEXAPORE products publish fabric figures with named methods; GORE-TEX garments generally publish no fabric figures. Compare construction, seams and fit instead of brand names.

What waterproof rating does TEXAPORE have?

It depends on the product. Jack Wolfskin product pages we checked list 10,000 mm and 20,000 mm, tested to JIS L 1092.

Sources

Official documentation and standards we relied on